This is about the next house that fits your specifications, right?
I suggest that you make offer at $925K. You may get it a few months down the road.
Posted by Larrygg on 04/15/08 at 05:54 AM
This whole Heloc thing has always baffled me. You take $100K out of your house and buy a car or take a trip or redo the kitchen. You still have to pay it back (someday) and you still have to make added payments every month. I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free. Isn’t that the road to financial freedom? Or I am I just a chump?
Posted by NoWow!way on 04/15/08 at 05:58 AM
We have friends who have a home similar to this. The kitchen is amazing.
However, as the kids are now off to college and will probably be out of the home permanantly in the near future, what the heck is a working couple going to do with this kind of monster? They haven’t talked about moving yet. They definitely bought at the right time and have had astronomical appreciation.
I am hoping that they are like our friends. They don’t need this size home and are scaling down and hoping to profit on their timely investment.
I’ve heard people in the lending industry claim that those teaser rates really do make sense if you have a short term time horizon for getting out of the home coming up.
Their furnishings are not elaborate and the patio stuff looks like they shop costco. Wicker in the front sitting room? Hardly trying to impress the Jones. And one picture of the blue couch is downright frumpy. These are regular people who have been raising their family in a decent “investment” home for the last few years. The time of buying into this neighborhood capitalized on an excellent upward move that the housing market took immediately after their purchase.
I believe this is in a gated community. I am not sure why they wouldn’t mention this in the MLS, if true.
Posted by NoWow!way on 04/15/08 at 06:00 AM
Yeah, Larry. You’re just a chump!
Posted by mav on 04/15/08 at 06:24 AM
The new graphic: “Maxed Out - HELOC” is awesome.
Are credit card companies reviewing their customer base for HELOCs and other outstanding debt? If they don’t shut these people off of the credit crack pipe things are going to get a lot worse. People were taking out HELOCs to pay off credit card debt. Now I fear the exact opposite is happening. Without home appreciation the ultimate result is ugly for everyone.
I hope credit card companies are reviewing the leverage of their customer base. There are too many rats jumping off this sinking ship that have no regards for responsibility and the greater good.
Posted by mav on 04/15/08 at 06:27 AM
I believe many americans now view credit as something they never have to pay back. As long as they can make interest payments, they can keep spending.
Yup george, this house is firmly in IPO’s target spec. This particular one backs to Culver so I wouldn’t touch it even at $925K.
I have been experiencing a good measure of glee as the inventory of 2700-3100sf homes in Northpark has continued to climb of late… There are 8-9 properties on the market today in that size range, all listed at least $50-75K over most recent comp.
I think somone will get desperate enough to start dropping price or maybe take a lowball over there and Family De IPO could as a result get a shiny almost-new Northpark home for $900K.
$900K on 2800sf in NP would mean another 15% off the last close in that size. 15% more would be enough for me to make the move… The place might still fall another 10-15%, but I’d be in long-term and wouldn’t care.
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 07:01 AM
I am your competitor, IPO; we are looking at similar house spec. I still have about 2 or 3 years before we *have* to move, but it is possible that you and I may ending up making an offer on the identical house.
Posted by lawyerliz on 04/15/08 at 07:16 AM
Impressive house. Lovely kitchen, except for the
high hats. Don’t like high hats; hard to change.
Aren’t high hats kinda out now?
So they spent all their money on the house and couldn’t afford furniture.
Let me guess, you probably have a 2-3 year old and the “have to” move coincides with kindegarten/first grade? That’s our situation as well… Almost four year old that we could do K with at his preschool, so we have a max of 27-28 months to milk out the price declines.
I made an offer on a Sunnyvale place late last year. Went for $50K more than I was willing to pay. Haven’t gone after an NP property since.
I think its a good possibility we end up in Tustin Ranch vs. Irvine. Prices are softening faster and the area right around Peters Canyon and Pioneer would be great to live at re: kids walking to school and such. I don’t like the overcrowding issues at Hicks…
“I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free.“
That reminded me of this good ABC news video that has an interview with Shiller as well as fun pictures!
The pay off your house thinking seems to have gone out of style, since it was easy to make $ off your house during the bubble. Shiller references it by saying we’ve turned into sort of an investment culture, and that could keep the price of homes volatile for a while.
Posted by Mark on 04/15/08 at 08:13 AM
“...you still have to make added payments every month. I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free.“
You can find “hard luck” stories in the media daily now, and while they touch on how the family is losing their home, the media never asks the direct question: “What was your plan? You received this exotic mortgage, but how were you ever going to make the payments after the adjustment period?“
I think most would answer, “But my broker said I’d always be able to refi.“ Even so, what was you plan? Were you going to refi every two years until you quit working and then move into an apt? ...
Doesn’t make sense…
Posted by buster on 04/15/08 at 08:14 AM
Mav - Make that USED to believe they would never have to pay back. It’s just a giant Ponzi scheme where one lender takes over from another and Americans keep refinancing their lives. But now the music has stopped and lenders refused to continually roll over debt. The bill has become due.
Posted by buster on 04/15/08 at 08:20 AM
caliguy - The way we look at it is as a long-term investment. We paid more to “buy” than to “rent” quite a while ago. Now inflation has pushed up comparable rents but our payments are the same. We look at the initially higher living costs as an investment that reaped future “lower-than-market” living costs, and it has worked out well.
If you take the long-term view, owning can be a good deal even if you haven’t yet paid off the mortgage. Of course, timing is everything and if you overpay on the front side you will be screwed for a long, long time.
Posted by tenmagnet on 04/15/08 at 08:30 AM
Excellent post, finally nice to see a quality home profiled.
Not only is this one beautiful but fully loaded with upgrades top to bottom.
The French Country exterior is exquisite.
An absolute keeper.
Considered this one long and hard, ultimately felt it was a little too small.
Although, if price declines substantially would move on it, for sure.
Great house, in a wonderful location.
Nicest house I have seen on this blog in a year I have been reading it. Curb appeal is still everything and of course location.
I never judge people by the furniture in their house. The wealthiest people I know live in a home I would not live in, they own commercial property with a net income of more than Two million a year and I am nervous to sit on their furniture for it looks so dirty, a tread mill and SoloFlex (remember those) in the living room, etc. I guess that’s called old money for So Cal.
I would love to have this home, I am a little concerned with traffic noise, but at the price they paid I will buy it today!
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 09:38 AM
Actually, my oldest boy is all set until he is done with 5th grade, which is ~3 yrs away, so your guess is on the right track. He and his siblings got into a nice elementary school in TUSD, but the middle school and high school is not as good as we want.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 09:41 AM
Great song choice, IR. One of my favorites!
I’m actually not a big fan of this house. Too close to the street, and I dislike the huge driveway. It’s American faux-French.
This property is exemplary of the ticking time bomb that is hidden in Irvine. Option Arms and.or low rate IO loans ready to explode in a wage deflationary environment.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 09:50 AM
Laughable, but people really thought equity was money when in fact it is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of money. It is debt that needs to be paid back.
Posted by jwbrown77 on 04/15/08 at 09:57 AM
One of John Bonham’s finest works and probably the best drum riff of all time.
Posted by freedomCM on 04/15/08 at 10:07 AM
I know it isn’t the “Irvine way”, but a 3k sqft house on a 3k sqft lot, for a million? living three feet from your neighbors wall isn’t what a million brings to mind. and backing onto a highway (culver is 50mph)?
BTW, how does IR know that they have have the oARM and HELOC? is it in an accessible database?
Posted by AAZZ on 04/15/08 at 10:10 AM
IHB is mentioned on Slate.com once again, same subject, the timebomb of prime adjustables mortages.
http://www.slate.com/id/2188982/
Posted by skek on 04/15/08 at 10:52 AM
The house is nice. Not my style, but nice. That’s a great kitchen for a family. But, the reason I will probably not end up in Irvine is the lot sizes. I can not fathom buying a family-sized house like this, and only getting a condo sized patio, er, yard.
3811 Claremont, someone bought it for less than $100K of the December 2006 purchase price… Someone paid a premium for that house, amazing.
Posted by Dave Doolin on 04/15/08 at 11:12 AM
Yeah, pretty much. I used to have this on vinyl. Why I am surprised I have hearing loss… go figure.
Posted by cosmo kramer on 04/15/08 at 11:24 AM
“WE’RE #6! WE’RE #6! RAH RAH RAH”
C’mon team, I know with a little hard work and the can do attitude that made America what it is today we can pass those pikers in Phoenix…
From a PMI press release:
PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., the U.S. subsidiary of The PMI Group, Inc., today released its Spring 2008 U.S. Market Risk Index [pdf], which ranks the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas according to the likelihood that home prices will be lower in two years.
1. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA: 93.2%
2. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV: 91.9%
3. Orlando-Kissimee, FL: 85.2%
4. Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL: 84.1%
5. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1 84.0%
6. Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA: 80.6%
7. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL: 79.6%
8. Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA: 77.7%
9. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL: 77.6%
10. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA: 77.2%
Posted by Surfing in Newport on 04/15/08 at 11:29 AM
Equity is money. What they forgot was that the replacement cost of the house was also going up. If you did something to raise the equity in the house (e.g. remodeling or paying down the debt) then you earned that equity. If the only thing that created the equity was overall housing prices going up, then it was kool-aid equity. That is, you were going to have to pay it back or lower your housing portion of your standard of living.
There is an excellent article at Fortune.com about Wachovia and why they had to anounce such disappointing earnings this week.
Take a guess at the culprite. OPTION ARMS!!!
The article is all about some lender they bought in 2006 named Golden West. The article has some great stats on Golden West’s loan portfolia in California.
The kicker is that even with all of the increases in default and risk, Golden West was considered “by far to be the most conservative” of ARM dealers.
Look out Orange County.
This information is available from many public records sources. I use Sitex.
Posted by Red on 04/15/08 at 12:22 PM
Wait, whats that at the end of Culver, across Portola Parkway ? SOMEBODYS MAKING LAND!
I thought they couldn’t do that anymore - these prices are justified, don’t worry…
The truth is, theres a lot of cheap, vacant land when the alternative is a couple hundred bucks an acre income from farming, and you can build a real nice house for $200 a sq foot. This could drop all the way back to the price they bought it for.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 12:25 PM
Again. equity is NOT money. Perhaps I should’ve clarified that by saying free money. Only if you sell your home do you have the monies free and clear. Borrowing money from a very illiquid asset is a far cry from having money saved in the bank or even stock market.
“Upgrades” cannot be valued monetarily with any degree of accuracy, because their value is in the eye of the beholder. Your upgrade may be hideous to another person.
Any lien using the property as collateral is reflected in county recordings, which is available to the public. IR does a remarkable job of sorting it out, though, as sometimes these loans get bootstrapped into other items or are “wrapped” into the next loan. Uberimpressive.
“This could drop all the way back to the price they bought it for.“
I was thinking the same thing. Prices were inflated in 2001, so when prices drop all the way back to rental parity, this place will probably go for somewhere around $600,000 - $650,000.
Posted by alan on 04/15/08 at 01:22 PM
If the economy really tanks like some economists are predicting there is no way to guess how low the floor will go. The problem with the economy is that people think most things are fine then there will be another round of layoff’s out of the blue, then more state and local government cutbacks, then another company closes and lay’s off, etc. Just like the housing market, the economy will not seize up and deflate overnight and people are still in denial in how bad things are going to get.
The End is Near…
Posted by Carl on 04/15/08 at 01:25 PM
I’ve never understood #8. I lived in the Sacramento area for ten years. Arden-Arcade is not a city, it is a neighborhood, and not a particularly noteworthy neighborhood either.
I think $25,000 an acre isn’t too much to pay for avocados if they are producing today. Those are probablly fetching closer to a quarter mil an acre when they move.
A couple of hundred bucks an acre? Only in Barstow.
Posted by David on 04/15/08 at 01:39 PM
Pioneer Middle is the top rated middle school in orange county. Why would you be concerned?
IR, what makes you believe prices were already inflated in the middle of 2001? Didn’t we overshoot inflation adjusted median during the last correction, i.e. values in 96-97 were well below inflated adjusted median?
Prices when this house were purchased had been climbing, but not exponentially so, for 3-4 years after 7 years of decline. I think 2002 prices are probably the inflation adjusted median and we’ll work our way down to there. This house will be $700-750K I’d think… That would probably be a 180 GRM.
Posted by Surfing in Newport on 04/15/08 at 02:19 PM
What I was trying to say was that equity is usually considered as part of your net worth. It has a dollar value, a monetary value. The question is whether or not you should consume that net worth. If it was a stock or a house you were renting out, it wouldn’t be considered bad to consume that net worth. Where people got into trouble was forgetting that they are using that asset, so you just can’t go out and liquidate it without replacing it.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 02:32 PM
IRVINE RENTER AND ANYONE WHO CAN HELP,
I am new to Irvine. My wife and I just moved out here in February. I found this blog somehow and absolutely love it. I am kind of an economics/markets junky, so this is fascinating.
I am trying to make sense of some numbers I found on the Lansner OCRegister blog.
City Zip Median Þcline #homessold Þcline
of #homessold
Irvine 92602 $740,000 -5.2% 30 -38.8%
Irvine 92603 $926,000 21.8% 24 -29.4%
Irvine 92604 $530,000 -13.4% 17 -46.9%
Irvine 92606 $605,000 1.2% 13 -43.5%
Irvine 92612 $483,500 -12.1% 11 -74.4%
Irvine 92614 $480,000 -12.9% 11 -56.0%
Irvine 92618 $503,500 -5.9% 19 -26.9%
Irvine 92620 $708,500 -2.9% 28 -44.0%
This data is from dataquick and is year over year.
How is it that the declines aren’t a higher percentage? I would think they would be coming down since the borders to Irvine have come down already.
Costa Mesa 92626 $521,500 -25.2% 20 -41.2%
Costa Mesa 92627 $487,500 -37.2% 21 -48.8%
Foothill Ranch 92610 $575,000 -15.1% 14 -33.3%
Laguna Hills 92653 $389,500 -52.0% 15 -55.9%
Laguna Woods 92637 $240,000 -15.6% 21 -50.0%
Lake Forest 92630 $375,000 -28.9% 26 -50.9%
Mission Viejo 92691 $505,000 -21.1% 41 -37.9%
Mission Viejo 92692 $500,000 -18.7% 25 -65.3%
Newport Beach 92660 $1,200,000 -17.2% 22 -46.3%
Newport Beach 92661 $1,580,250 -41.3% 2 -50.0%
Newport Beach 92663 $1,169,090 -7.2% 14 -44.0%
Newport Coast 92657 $3,410,000 156.9% 11 -64.5%
Tustin 92780 $385,000 -34.2% 26 -31.6%
Tustin 92782 $570,000 -25.5% 28 -64.6%
Countywide
All resale houses $570,000 -18.0% 1,072 -42.8%
All condominiums $375,000 -18.5% 408 -51.3%
All new homes $516,500 -17.4% 183 -56.2%
All homes $506,000 -19.6% 1,663 -46.9%
Anybody who has some insight, please comment. I am 24 and my wife and I would love to stay in Irvine, but there is NO way we could afford it (in the next 2 or 3 years when we look at a home or condo) if prices do not fall in line with incomes.
We make 90K plus between the two of us, but I don’t really like the taste of Kool Aid. We out of state transplants have a different perspective.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 02:35 PM
The data key for my above post didn’t come out right.
It is:
City Zip Median Price Percent decline then
Number of homes sold and Number Sold decline
Posted by lowrydr310 on 04/15/08 at 02:41 PM
Keep drinking your f*ing Kool-Aid! The 2001 purchase price is what this home is really worth, and don’t let anyone fool you into thinking otherwise.
Sure you have more than a handful of high wage earners in Irvine to support higher home prices, but the smart way to manage your money is NOT to piss most of it away on an overpriced home.
Say what you want, but I’m sitting back and enjoying the wicked ride back to reality. Back in the late 1990s, what was stopping people from buying dirt cheap homes? Incomes in SoCal were still higher than average then, yet for some reason the demand was much less.
Posted by houseonlegs on 04/15/08 at 03:29 PM
These figures are based on the MEDIAN. Half of the homes sold for less and half of the homes sold for more. The median is not the most accurate figure for actual price declines as it is very broad. Prices are declining, nobody can pin point exactly how much so far, and how much further we have to go.
“Back in the late 1990s, what was stopping people from buying dirt cheap homes? Incomes in SoCal were still higher than average then, yet for some reason the demand was much less.“
The answer is probably high mortgage rates. Back in 96-97, conforming 30-year rates were around 8% or into the low 8% range. Contrast with today, where they are below 6%...
Posted by Genius on 04/15/08 at 04:11 PM
For $1mil I’ll take some land k thx. I realize this is socal and it’s a bit crowded, but I draw the line when my home is being sodomized by the house next door.
products72 was my magic word.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 04:43 PM
Thanks for the reply house on legs,
I just find it baffling how everything around Irvine in these stats shows such drops and somehow Irvine hasn’t quite tanked with the other cities.
IRVINE RENTER, could you please shed some light on why the surrounding areas including Newport have stats showing big declines, but Irvine has not quite yet?
Posted by BrianH on 04/15/08 at 05:13 PM
I will admit that I don’t everything about the mortgage world after 10 years of being a front line residential loan officer. However, I have never heard of a 2/28 Option ARM. There are 2/28 loans that were a fixed rate for 24 months and then turned into an adjustable loan. There are Option ARMs that are monthly adjustable rate loans but as far as I know there is no combination of the two.
Posted by Eric U on 04/15/08 at 05:45 PM
Calculated risk had an post with excerpts from their teleconference with investors: http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/04/wachovia-on-walking-away.html
They make repeated reference to their “pick a pay portfolio,“ which I assume means option ARMs. Interesting that these particular loans are such a big part of their problems that they effectively focus only on that portfolio.
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 06:26 PM
I don’t remember which is the assigned MS, but it won’t be Pioneer. The HS would be Tustin HS, not Foothill or Beckman.
That looks like a gorgeous house. Too bad its about 5 times more than I can afford!
Posted by jhill on 04/15/08 at 09:41 PM
The problem with the tiny lots is that the neighbors are really close. However, there is an upside in that most people are really too busy for yard maintenance, and landscapers are expensive. Also, kids are different today. They do a great deal of organized playgroup, kid-league sports, lessons, etc., and by the time they are 12 or 13 they would rather die than play in their yard at home. I am sure that developers have studied these trends and plot accordingly. I think it’s sad, but there you go. Of course there is that mid-west style where a suburban house still means an acre or half-acre and a lawnmower you can ride! Still to be found in many states, but not in CA.
Posted by zoiks on 04/15/08 at 11:02 PM
Hi NewToTheArea…
You ain’t from ‘round here, are ya? Oh yeah your name is NewToTheArea…
Anyhoo, there’s 2 things you need to understand:
1) You and your wife are living below the poverty line, at least as far as Irvine is concerned. You need to double your salary immediately or get out before you starve to death.
2) The thing you need to understand about Irvine is that housing busts are a non-Irvine phenomenon. Irvine is different. Just ask ipoplaya.
Posted by GaMike on 04/16/08 at 12:22 AM
Demographics my man, and the interest rates. The 90’s were different in those two very important ways.
The big story, for California and places like Atlanta where I am, is the changing demographic picture. As people move in they need places to live. Everyone rather have a house, than an apratment. Lots of singles now want houses also. Builders are slow to catch up with demand, so prices rise. Then builders switch on the turbo boosters and build way too much, or in GA’s case build too far from the jobs.
We (GA) are in better position than CA in that our prices didn’t rise so much, mainly because we didn’t have natural boundaries. But those outlying areas in Atlanta are feeling the hurt.
But the people are still moving here from Cleveland, Michigan, etc. So they still need houses. Not sure how your area looks people wise.
But look to the demographics, which also now include lots of downsizers to see how this should play out.
Posted by TurtleRidgeRenter on 04/16/08 at 01:15 AM
Okay, Liz… I give up. What’s a high hat?
Posted by TurtleRidgeRenter on 04/16/08 at 01:18 AM
Strawberry iMac on the stair landing! Awww, I love that little pink computer.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:01 AM
Northpark is the new Little Bagdad. As soon as the last helicopter takes off from the roof of the new $780M embassy, expect the flood of refugees to settle there. You heard it here first.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:18 AM
Oh yes, that house…only one house away from the wildlife corridor / 405 freeway.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:34 AM
Did you that Santa Ana has a population density greater than Boston, Newark, Miami & Philly?
That’s what taxes are for, right? You pay taxes, so that you never have to pay back the loans.
Posted by H on 04/16/08 at 05:07 AM
I think they use the names of official census tracts that go back many decades or more. It’s not about the neighborhood per se.
Posted by BrianH on 04/16/08 at 06:12 AM
See, the interest rate, like mentioned above, starts adjusting from the first month. The minimum or Negative Amortizing payment option can be fixed for 12 months, 24 months or whatever. There was even a few banks pushing a 5 year fixed NegAm payment. That doesn’t make the loan a 2/28 or a 5/25.
All I’m pointing out is that you need to make sure you are talking about the correct thing and a 2/28 Option ARM doesn’t exist. A NegAm option ARM is what it is. I also see all the time people talking about the idiots who purchased 100% zero down on a subprime Option ARM. I know that a few subprime places had option ARM’s but none went 100% LTV that I’m aware of.
Posted by doug r on 04/16/08 at 08:30 AM
I never got paying off your option ARM with a HELOC. I guess that’s why you get a five year so you can sell before it all turns to sh*t. Oh well, so sad.
Posted by skek on 04/16/08 at 08:36 AM
I agree with you that kids are “different today.“ The problem is, while some do “organized playgroup, kid-league sports, lessons, etc.“ too many of them really just sit on their fat arses playing X-Box or watching television.
Still, I want a midwest-sized yard and darnit, I’m going to find me one.
Posted by Headless Unicorn Guy on 04/23/08 at 09:57 AM
Think about the ramifications of that belief and the decision it influenced: Homeowners who did not take out their equity and refinance with Option ARMs are not going to be in financial trouble, and they will keep their homes. Those that did take out their equity are going to lose their homes.
It’s election year. Those that did take out their equity in ever-increasing cash-out refis will get bailed out by the Government. (So will their new Beemers, 80” Plasma-screens, and speedboats all paid for by the refis.) Only us stupid suckers “who did not take out their equity and refi” and lived within our means will get the Kancho.
Posted by george8 on 04/15/08 at 05:30 AM
IPO:
This is about the next house that fits your specifications, right?
I suggest that you make offer at $925K. You may get it a few months down the road.
Posted by Larrygg on 04/15/08 at 05:54 AM
This whole Heloc thing has always baffled me. You take $100K out of your house and buy a car or take a trip or redo the kitchen. You still have to pay it back (someday) and you still have to make added payments every month. I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free. Isn’t that the road to financial freedom? Or I am I just a chump?
Posted by NoWow!way on 04/15/08 at 05:58 AM
We have friends who have a home similar to this. The kitchen is amazing.
However, as the kids are now off to college and will probably be out of the home permanantly in the near future, what the heck is a working couple going to do with this kind of monster? They haven’t talked about moving yet. They definitely bought at the right time and have had astronomical appreciation.
I am hoping that they are like our friends. They don’t need this size home and are scaling down and hoping to profit on their timely investment.
I’ve heard people in the lending industry claim that those teaser rates really do make sense if you have a short term time horizon for getting out of the home coming up.
Their furnishings are not elaborate and the patio stuff looks like they shop costco. Wicker in the front sitting room? Hardly trying to impress the Jones. And one picture of the blue couch is downright frumpy. These are regular people who have been raising their family in a decent “investment” home for the last few years. The time of buying into this neighborhood capitalized on an excellent upward move that the housing market took immediately after their purchase.
I believe this is in a gated community. I am not sure why they wouldn’t mention this in the MLS, if true.
Posted by NoWow!way on 04/15/08 at 06:00 AM
Yeah, Larry. You’re just a chump!

Posted by mav on 04/15/08 at 06:24 AM
The new graphic: “Maxed Out - HELOC” is awesome.
Are credit card companies reviewing their customer base for HELOCs and other outstanding debt? If they don’t shut these people off of the credit crack pipe things are going to get a lot worse. People were taking out HELOCs to pay off credit card debt. Now I fear the exact opposite is happening. Without home appreciation the ultimate result is ugly for everyone.
I hope credit card companies are reviewing the leverage of their customer base. There are too many rats jumping off this sinking ship that have no regards for responsibility and the greater good.
Posted by mav on 04/15/08 at 06:27 AM
I believe many americans now view credit as something they never have to pay back. As long as they can make interest payments, they can keep spending.
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 06:55 AM
Yup george, this house is firmly in IPO’s target spec. This particular one backs to Culver so I wouldn’t touch it even at $925K.
I have been experiencing a good measure of glee as the inventory of 2700-3100sf homes in Northpark has continued to climb of late… There are 8-9 properties on the market today in that size range, all listed at least $50-75K over most recent comp.
I think somone will get desperate enough to start dropping price or maybe take a lowball over there and Family De IPO could as a result get a shiny almost-new Northpark home for $900K.
$900K on 2800sf in NP would mean another 15% off the last close in that size. 15% more would be enough for me to make the move… The place might still fall another 10-15%, but I’d be in long-term and wouldn’t care.
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 07:01 AM
I am your competitor, IPO; we are looking at similar house spec. I still have about 2 or 3 years before we *have* to move, but it is possible that you and I may ending up making an offer on the identical house.
Posted by lawyerliz on 04/15/08 at 07:16 AM
Impressive house. Lovely kitchen, except for the
high hats. Don’t like high hats; hard to change.
Aren’t high hats kinda out now?
So they spent all their money on the house and couldn’t afford furniture.
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 07:37 AM
Let me guess, you probably have a 2-3 year old and the “have to” move coincides with kindegarten/first grade? That’s our situation as well… Almost four year old that we could do K with at his preschool, so we have a max of 27-28 months to milk out the price declines.
I made an offer on a Sunnyvale place late last year. Went for $50K more than I was willing to pay. Haven’t gone after an NP property since.
I think its a good possibility we end up in Tustin Ranch vs. Irvine. Prices are softening faster and the area right around Peters Canyon and Pioneer would be great to live at re: kids walking to school and such. I don’t like the overcrowding issues at Hicks…
Posted by caliguy2699 on 04/15/08 at 07:52 AM
“I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free.“
That reminded me of this good ABC news video that has an interview with Shiller as well as fun pictures!
The pay off your house thinking seems to have gone out of style, since it was easy to make $ off your house during the bubble. Shiller references it by saying we’ve turned into sort of an investment culture, and that could keep the price of homes volatile for a while.
Posted by Mark on 04/15/08 at 08:13 AM
“...you still have to make added payments every month. I always thought the goal was to buy a house you like and try to pay it off so you could live rent free.“
You can find “hard luck” stories in the media daily now, and while they touch on how the family is losing their home, the media never asks the direct question: “What was your plan? You received this exotic mortgage, but how were you ever going to make the payments after the adjustment period?“
I think most would answer, “But my broker said I’d always be able to refi.“ Even so, what was you plan? Were you going to refi every two years until you quit working and then move into an apt? ...
Doesn’t make sense…
Posted by buster on 04/15/08 at 08:14 AM
Mav - Make that USED to believe they would never have to pay back. It’s just a giant Ponzi scheme where one lender takes over from another and Americans keep refinancing their lives. But now the music has stopped and lenders refused to continually roll over debt. The bill has become due.
Posted by buster on 04/15/08 at 08:20 AM
caliguy - The way we look at it is as a long-term investment. We paid more to “buy” than to “rent” quite a while ago. Now inflation has pushed up comparable rents but our payments are the same. We look at the initially higher living costs as an investment that reaped future “lower-than-market” living costs, and it has worked out well.
If you take the long-term view, owning can be a good deal even if you haven’t yet paid off the mortgage. Of course, timing is everything and if you overpay on the front side you will be screwed for a long, long time.
Posted by tenmagnet on 04/15/08 at 08:30 AM
Excellent post, finally nice to see a quality home profiled.
Not only is this one beautiful but fully loaded with upgrades top to bottom.
The French Country exterior is exquisite.
An absolute keeper.
Considered this one long and hard, ultimately felt it was a little too small.
Although, if price declines substantially would move on it, for sure.
Great house, in a wonderful location.
Posted by DeadBeatRenter on 04/15/08 at 09:06 AM
Nicest house I have seen on this blog in a year I have been reading it. Curb appeal is still everything and of course location.
I never judge people by the furniture in their house. The wealthiest people I know live in a home I would not live in, they own commercial property with a net income of more than Two million a year and I am nervous to sit on their furniture for it looks so dirty, a tread mill and SoloFlex (remember those) in the living room, etc. I guess that’s called old money for So Cal.
I would love to have this home, I am a little concerned with traffic noise, but at the price they paid I will buy it today!
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 09:38 AM
Actually, my oldest boy is all set until he is done with 5th grade, which is ~3 yrs away, so your guess is on the right track. He and his siblings got into a nice elementary school in TUSD, but the middle school and high school is not as good as we want.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 09:41 AM
Great song choice, IR. One of my favorites!
I’m actually not a big fan of this house. Too close to the street, and I dislike the huge driveway. It’s American faux-French.
This property is exemplary of the ticking time bomb that is hidden in Irvine. Option Arms and.or low rate IO loans ready to explode in a wage deflationary environment.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 09:50 AM
Laughable, but people really thought equity was money when in fact it is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of money. It is debt that needs to be paid back.
Posted by jwbrown77 on 04/15/08 at 09:57 AM
One of John Bonham’s finest works and probably the best drum riff of all time.
Posted by freedomCM on 04/15/08 at 10:07 AM
I know it isn’t the “Irvine way”, but a 3k sqft house on a 3k sqft lot, for a million? living three feet from your neighbors wall isn’t what a million brings to mind. and backing onto a highway (culver is 50mph)?
BTW, how does IR know that they have have the oARM and HELOC? is it in an accessible database?
Posted by AAZZ on 04/15/08 at 10:10 AM
IHB is mentioned on Slate.com once again, same subject, the timebomb of prime adjustables mortages.
http://www.slate.com/id/2188982/
Posted by skek on 04/15/08 at 10:52 AM
The house is nice. Not my style, but nice. That’s a great kitchen for a family. But, the reason I will probably not end up in Irvine is the lot sizes. I can not fathom buying a family-sized house like this, and only getting a condo sized patio, er, yard.
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 10:58 AM
Hey IR, one of your featured properties closed:
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/blog/comments/downpayment-blues/
3811 Claremont, someone bought it for less than $100K of the December 2006 purchase price… Someone paid a premium for that house, amazing.
Posted by Dave Doolin on 04/15/08 at 11:12 AM
Yeah, pretty much. I used to have this on vinyl. Why I am surprised I have hearing loss… go figure.
Posted by cosmo kramer on 04/15/08 at 11:24 AM
“WE’RE #6! WE’RE #6! RAH RAH RAH”
C’mon team, I know with a little hard work and the can do attitude that made America what it is today we can pass those pikers in Phoenix…
From a PMI press release:
PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., the U.S. subsidiary of The PMI Group, Inc., today released its Spring 2008 U.S. Market Risk Index [pdf], which ranks the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas according to the likelihood that home prices will be lower in two years.
1. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA: 93.2%
2. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV: 91.9%
3. Orlando-Kissimee, FL: 85.2%
4. Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL: 84.1%
5. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1 84.0%
6. Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA: 80.6%
7. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL: 79.6%
8. Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA: 77.7%
9. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL: 77.6%
10. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA: 77.2%
Posted by Surfing in Newport on 04/15/08 at 11:29 AM
Equity is money. What they forgot was that the replacement cost of the house was also going up. If you did something to raise the equity in the house (e.g. remodeling or paying down the debt) then you earned that equity. If the only thing that created the equity was overall housing prices going up, then it was kool-aid equity. That is, you were going to have to pay it back or lower your housing portion of your standard of living.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 11:54 AM
To Irvine Renter and everyone else,
There is an excellent article at Fortune.com about Wachovia and why they had to anounce such disappointing earnings this week.
Take a guess at the culprite. OPTION ARMS!!!
The article is all about some lender they bought in 2006 named Golden West. The article has some great stats on Golden West’s loan portfolia in California.
The kicker is that even with all of the increases in default and risk, Golden West was considered “by far to be the most conservative” of ARM dealers.
Look out Orange County.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 11:55 AM
Here is the link
http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/14/news/companies/boyd_wachovia.fortune/index.htm
Posted by IrvineRenter on 04/15/08 at 12:20 PM
This information is available from many public records sources. I use Sitex.
Posted by Red on 04/15/08 at 12:22 PM
Wait, whats that at the end of Culver, across Portola Parkway ? SOMEBODYS MAKING LAND!
I thought they couldn’t do that anymore - these prices are justified, don’t worry…
The truth is, theres a lot of cheap, vacant land when the alternative is a couple hundred bucks an acre income from farming, and you can build a real nice house for $200 a sq foot. This could drop all the way back to the price they bought it for.
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 12:25 PM
Again. equity is NOT money. Perhaps I should’ve clarified that by saying free money. Only if you sell your home do you have the monies free and clear. Borrowing money from a very illiquid asset is a far cry from having money saved in the bank or even stock market.
“Upgrades” cannot be valued monetarily with any degree of accuracy, because their value is in the eye of the beholder. Your upgrade may be hideous to another person.
Posted by IrvineRenter on 04/15/08 at 12:27 PM
Cool! I wish I could claim credit for the term homedebtor, but it has been around for a while.
Posted by IrvineRealtor on 04/15/08 at 12:30 PM
Any lien using the property as collateral is reflected in county recordings, which is available to the public. IR does a remarkable job of sorting it out, though, as sometimes these loans get bootstrapped into other items or are “wrapped” into the next loan. Uberimpressive.
Posted by IrvineRenter on 04/15/08 at 12:36 PM
“This could drop all the way back to the price they bought it for.“
I was thinking the same thing. Prices were inflated in 2001, so when prices drop all the way back to rental parity, this place will probably go for somewhere around $600,000 - $650,000.
Posted by alan on 04/15/08 at 01:22 PM
If the economy really tanks like some economists are predicting there is no way to guess how low the floor will go. The problem with the economy is that people think most things are fine then there will be another round of layoff’s out of the blue, then more state and local government cutbacks, then another company closes and lay’s off, etc. Just like the housing market, the economy will not seize up and deflate overnight and people are still in denial in how bad things are going to get.
The End is Near…
Posted by Carl on 04/15/08 at 01:25 PM
I’ve never understood #8. I lived in the Sacramento area for ten years. Arden-Arcade is not a city, it is a neighborhood, and not a particularly noteworthy neighborhood either.
Posted by no_vaseline on 04/15/08 at 01:28 PM
Those avocados are coming out at a big premium.
I think $25,000 an acre isn’t too much to pay for avocados if they are producing today. Those are probablly fetching closer to a quarter mil an acre when they move.
A couple of hundred bucks an acre? Only in Barstow.
Posted by David on 04/15/08 at 01:39 PM
Pioneer Middle is the top rated middle school in orange county. Why would you be concerned?
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 01:49 PM
IR, what makes you believe prices were already inflated in the middle of 2001? Didn’t we overshoot inflation adjusted median during the last correction, i.e. values in 96-97 were well below inflated adjusted median?
Prices when this house were purchased had been climbing, but not exponentially so, for 3-4 years after 7 years of decline. I think 2002 prices are probably the inflation adjusted median and we’ll work our way down to there. This house will be $700-750K I’d think… That would probably be a 180 GRM.
Posted by Surfing in Newport on 04/15/08 at 02:19 PM
What I was trying to say was that equity is usually considered as part of your net worth. It has a dollar value, a monetary value. The question is whether or not you should consume that net worth. If it was a stock or a house you were renting out, it wouldn’t be considered bad to consume that net worth. Where people got into trouble was forgetting that they are using that asset, so you just can’t go out and liquidate it without replacing it.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 02:32 PM
IRVINE RENTER AND ANYONE WHO CAN HELP,
I am new to Irvine. My wife and I just moved out here in February. I found this blog somehow and absolutely love it. I am kind of an economics/markets junky, so this is fascinating.
I am trying to make sense of some numbers I found on the Lansner OCRegister blog.
City Zip Median Þcline #homessold Þcline
of #homessold
Irvine 92602 $740,000 -5.2% 30 -38.8%
Irvine 92603 $926,000 21.8% 24 -29.4%
Irvine 92604 $530,000 -13.4% 17 -46.9%
Irvine 92606 $605,000 1.2% 13 -43.5%
Irvine 92612 $483,500 -12.1% 11 -74.4%
Irvine 92614 $480,000 -12.9% 11 -56.0%
Irvine 92618 $503,500 -5.9% 19 -26.9%
Irvine 92620 $708,500 -2.9% 28 -44.0%
This data is from dataquick and is year over year.
How is it that the declines aren’t a higher percentage? I would think they would be coming down since the borders to Irvine have come down already.
Costa Mesa 92626 $521,500 -25.2% 20 -41.2%
Costa Mesa 92627 $487,500 -37.2% 21 -48.8%
Foothill Ranch 92610 $575,000 -15.1% 14 -33.3%
Laguna Hills 92653 $389,500 -52.0% 15 -55.9%
Laguna Woods 92637 $240,000 -15.6% 21 -50.0%
Lake Forest 92630 $375,000 -28.9% 26 -50.9%
Mission Viejo 92691 $505,000 -21.1% 41 -37.9%
Mission Viejo 92692 $500,000 -18.7% 25 -65.3%
Newport Beach 92660 $1,200,000 -17.2% 22 -46.3%
Newport Beach 92661 $1,580,250 -41.3% 2 -50.0%
Newport Beach 92663 $1,169,090 -7.2% 14 -44.0%
Newport Coast 92657 $3,410,000 156.9% 11 -64.5%
Tustin 92780 $385,000 -34.2% 26 -31.6%
Tustin 92782 $570,000 -25.5% 28 -64.6%
Countywide
All resale houses $570,000 -18.0% 1,072 -42.8%
All condominiums $375,000 -18.5% 408 -51.3%
All new homes $516,500 -17.4% 183 -56.2%
All homes $506,000 -19.6% 1,663 -46.9%
Anybody who has some insight, please comment. I am 24 and my wife and I would love to stay in Irvine, but there is NO way we could afford it (in the next 2 or 3 years when we look at a home or condo) if prices do not fall in line with incomes.
We make 90K plus between the two of us, but I don’t really like the taste of Kool Aid. We out of state transplants have a different perspective.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 02:35 PM
The data key for my above post didn’t come out right.
It is:
City Zip Median Price Percent decline then
Number of homes sold and Number Sold decline
Posted by lowrydr310 on 04/15/08 at 02:41 PM
Keep drinking your f*ing Kool-Aid! The 2001 purchase price is what this home is really worth, and don’t let anyone fool you into thinking otherwise.
Sure you have more than a handful of high wage earners in Irvine to support higher home prices, but the smart way to manage your money is NOT to piss most of it away on an overpriced home.
Say what you want, but I’m sitting back and enjoying the wicked ride back to reality. Back in the late 1990s, what was stopping people from buying dirt cheap homes? Incomes in SoCal were still higher than average then, yet for some reason the demand was much less.
Posted by houseonlegs on 04/15/08 at 03:29 PM
These figures are based on the MEDIAN. Half of the homes sold for less and half of the homes sold for more. The median is not the most accurate figure for actual price declines as it is very broad. Prices are declining, nobody can pin point exactly how much so far, and how much further we have to go.
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 04:06 PM
“Back in the late 1990s, what was stopping people from buying dirt cheap homes? Incomes in SoCal were still higher than average then, yet for some reason the demand was much less.“
The answer is probably high mortgage rates. Back in 96-97, conforming 30-year rates were around 8% or into the low 8% range. Contrast with today, where they are below 6%...
Posted by Genius on 04/15/08 at 04:11 PM
For $1mil I’ll take some land k thx. I realize this is socal and it’s a bit crowded, but I draw the line when my home is being sodomized by the house next door.
products72 was my magic word.
Posted by NewToTheArea on 04/15/08 at 04:43 PM
Thanks for the reply house on legs,
I just find it baffling how everything around Irvine in these stats shows such drops and somehow Irvine hasn’t quite tanked with the other cities.
IRVINE RENTER, could you please shed some light on why the surrounding areas including Newport have stats showing big declines, but Irvine has not quite yet?
Posted by BrianH on 04/15/08 at 05:13 PM
I will admit that I don’t everything about the mortgage world after 10 years of being a front line residential loan officer. However, I have never heard of a 2/28 Option ARM. There are 2/28 loans that were a fixed rate for 24 months and then turned into an adjustable loan. There are Option ARMs that are monthly adjustable rate loans but as far as I know there is no combination of the two.
Posted by Eric U on 04/15/08 at 05:45 PM
Calculated risk had an post with excerpts from their teleconference with investors: http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/04/wachovia-on-walking-away.html
They make repeated reference to their “pick a pay portfolio,“ which I assume means option ARMs. Interesting that these particular loans are such a big part of their problems that they effectively focus only on that portfolio.
Posted by 7 on 04/15/08 at 06:26 PM
I don’t remember which is the assigned MS, but it won’t be Pioneer. The HS would be Tustin HS, not Foothill or Beckman.
Posted by ipoplaya on 04/15/08 at 07:48 PM
Here’s a link Brian regarding a 2-year pay option mortgage:
http://www.chevychasewholesale.com/pdf/wds823_cf2ylib115.pdf
2-year pay options have a fixed minimum payment for 24 months. Interest is variable during that time I believe and probably adjusts monthly…
Posted by lendingmaestro on 04/15/08 at 08:04 PM
It’s not really a 2/28, because its actually fully adjustable from day one.
Posted by IE Renter on 04/15/08 at 08:38 PM
I’m #1, yay!!!!!!
Posted by Jasers on 04/15/08 at 09:18 PM
That looks like a gorgeous house. Too bad its about 5 times more than I can afford!
Posted by jhill on 04/15/08 at 09:41 PM
The problem with the tiny lots is that the neighbors are really close. However, there is an upside in that most people are really too busy for yard maintenance, and landscapers are expensive. Also, kids are different today. They do a great deal of organized playgroup, kid-league sports, lessons, etc., and by the time they are 12 or 13 they would rather die than play in their yard at home. I am sure that developers have studied these trends and plot accordingly. I think it’s sad, but there you go. Of course there is that mid-west style where a suburban house still means an acre or half-acre and a lawnmower you can ride! Still to be found in many states, but not in CA.
Posted by zoiks on 04/15/08 at 11:02 PM
Hi NewToTheArea…
You ain’t from ‘round here, are ya? Oh yeah your name is NewToTheArea…
Anyhoo, there’s 2 things you need to understand:
1) You and your wife are living below the poverty line, at least as far as Irvine is concerned. You need to double your salary immediately or get out before you starve to death.
2) The thing you need to understand about Irvine is that housing busts are a non-Irvine phenomenon. Irvine is different. Just ask ipoplaya.
Posted by GaMike on 04/16/08 at 12:22 AM
Demographics my man, and the interest rates. The 90’s were different in those two very important ways.
The big story, for California and places like Atlanta where I am, is the changing demographic picture. As people move in they need places to live. Everyone rather have a house, than an apratment. Lots of singles now want houses also. Builders are slow to catch up with demand, so prices rise. Then builders switch on the turbo boosters and build way too much, or in GA’s case build too far from the jobs.
We (GA) are in better position than CA in that our prices didn’t rise so much, mainly because we didn’t have natural boundaries. But those outlying areas in Atlanta are feeling the hurt.
But the people are still moving here from Cleveland, Michigan, etc. So they still need houses. Not sure how your area looks people wise.
But look to the demographics, which also now include lots of downsizers to see how this should play out.
Posted by TurtleRidgeRenter on 04/16/08 at 01:15 AM
Okay, Liz… I give up. What’s a high hat?
Posted by TurtleRidgeRenter on 04/16/08 at 01:18 AM
Strawberry iMac on the stair landing! Awww, I love that little pink computer.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:01 AM
Northpark is the new Little Bagdad. As soon as the last helicopter takes off from the roof of the new $780M embassy, expect the flood of refugees to settle there. You heard it here first.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:18 AM
Oh yes, that house…only one house away from the wildlife corridor / 405 freeway.
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:34 AM
Did you that Santa Ana has a population density greater than Boston, Newark, Miami & Philly?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States
Posted by LC on 04/16/08 at 02:41 AM
That’s what taxes are for, right? You pay taxes, so that you never have to pay back the loans.
Posted by H on 04/16/08 at 05:07 AM
I think they use the names of official census tracts that go back many decades or more. It’s not about the neighborhood per se.
Posted by BrianH on 04/16/08 at 06:12 AM
See, the interest rate, like mentioned above, starts adjusting from the first month. The minimum or Negative Amortizing payment option can be fixed for 12 months, 24 months or whatever. There was even a few banks pushing a 5 year fixed NegAm payment. That doesn’t make the loan a 2/28 or a 5/25.
All I’m pointing out is that you need to make sure you are talking about the correct thing and a 2/28 Option ARM doesn’t exist. A NegAm option ARM is what it is. I also see all the time people talking about the idiots who purchased 100% zero down on a subprime Option ARM. I know that a few subprime places had option ARM’s but none went 100% LTV that I’m aware of.
Posted by doug r on 04/16/08 at 08:30 AM
I never got paying off your option ARM with a HELOC. I guess that’s why you get a five year so you can sell before it all turns to sh*t. Oh well, so sad.
Posted by skek on 04/16/08 at 08:36 AM
I agree with you that kids are “different today.“ The problem is, while some do “organized playgroup, kid-league sports, lessons, etc.“ too many of them really just sit on their fat arses playing X-Box or watching television.
Still, I want a midwest-sized yard and darnit, I’m going to find me one.
Posted by Headless Unicorn Guy on 04/23/08 at 09:57 AM
Think about the ramifications of that belief and the decision it influenced: Homeowners who did not take out their equity and refinance with Option ARMs are not going to be in financial trouble, and they will keep their homes. Those that did take out their equity are going to lose their homes.
It’s election year. Those that did take out their equity in ever-increasing cash-out refis will get bailed out by the Government. (So will their new Beemers, 80” Plasma-screens, and speedboats all paid for by the refis.) Only us stupid suckers “who did not take out their equity and refi” and lived within our means will get the Kancho.