Replying to:

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 12:32 PM

Everyone in Irvine is wealthy well beyond any need for a silly paradigm such as that.

We’ll see the effects of credit on prices in a couple of months I’m guessing.

Posted by rerip2007 on 10/16/06 at 04:23 PM

I hope this flipper is greedy and rides the market all the way down.  What are these morons thinking?  Did he really expect to make $160,000 by buying then selling a month later?  I am tired of these quick money scam-artists. 

I really hope he waits until this property sucks his down payment and savings dry.  I think these housing flippers will learn a terrible lesson in 2007.  House is not a stock that you can flip.  House is very illiquid and this flipper will learn it the hard way.  Good luck on that IO/Liar loan.
——-

Posted by sidelined_buyer on 10/16/06 at 10:08 PM

don’t forget that each day this property remains unsold the seller is losing a lot of cash.  His downpayment could be earning 8-10% in other investments.

Posted by lawyerliz on 12/26/07 at 05:53 AM

Only 2 comments in 10/06?  Boy has the blog grown.  You guys are to be commended in sticking with it.

One thing I’ve noticed in all the pictures, including the ones that were not so bad, is that they nearly always focus in on the garage, as tho it were cars that mostly live there, not people.  For that reason, I don’t like houses where the garage opening makes a right angle with the front door.  So instead of looking out on greenery, you look out on either a driveway, or your parked cars.

Posted by lawyerliz on 12/26/07 at 05:53 AM

Also, why would they lower the price and then raise it again?

Posted by OptimusPrime on 12/26/07 at 06:27 AM

For $665k, probably.  It works out to about $300 per/sq ft

But I think $600k is doable smile

Posted by Hmmmm on 12/26/07 at 06:39 AM

I love it. I hope you do more follow ups. I think the 2003 price is still very high given the income needed to support a mortgage of that amount, but maybe more acceptable in the Irvine Market. No more funny money flowing these days however.

So if I am reading this right, the seller has had this on the market almost two years? Any chance it has been rented at all or has it been vacant the whole time? I would imagine that after two years of interest only payments, there is not a point where the owner could make money or break even in this market.


I also agree about the garage shots. I think it is a function of the house design itself. They tend to be narrow and long. a two car garage is going to take up 25’ of width and then you add 15’ feet more for the door and whatever and the garage will always be the most prominent feature. Tha lots are way too narrow to allow for rear entry garages.

I also love all of the shots of inside the garages. What exactly are they trying to show there? That the garage actually exists and it hasn’t been converted to a living space? I don’t really understand it myself.

Posted by George8 on 12/26/07 at 07:18 AM

This Woodbridge home is about 1/3 mile from the busy 405 expressway (from Gmap). For those of you living in S Cal., how far does the expressway traffic noise have negative impact on home location?

Do you think the 405 noise has negative impact on this home?

Posted by Mr Vincent on 12/26/07 at 07:29 AM

A standard, decent looking house on a tiny lot.

Is it just me or does the 2003 price seem like a lot of money to pay for a house like this? I guess thats what happens when manias end. We can look at things for what they really are.

Posted by no_vaseline on 12/26/07 at 07:49 AM

George:

The 405 is soundwalled off.  I live about a hundred yards from the 55 and can see the soundwall from the street in front of my house.  I can’t hear the freeway at all.

When I lived in Chino Hills, I was about 250 yards from Chino Hills Parkway and you could absolutely hear that one (no soundwall).

Posted by slacker kate on 12/26/07 at 08:17 AM

anybody for starting a pool on what these properties eventually sell for and when? winner gets an IHB t-shirt?

Posted by ochomehunter on 12/26/07 at 08:17 AM

This guy will most definitely chase the market down; he wouldn’t be raising the price otherwise.  This guy needs to get burned bad as he kept genuine home owner out of reach by buying in 2006 and then holding the price higher, had he not purchased in 2006 for the price he paid, some genuine guy may have bought this for much less as its primary residence.

These are the folks who are delaying the inevitable.  To answer the question whether I would buy or not, I would not buy anything until the mortgage gets within 15% of what you would pay rental for the same property.  Let me know what that happens.

Posted by mark on 12/26/07 at 08:28 AM

My best guess would be that this flipper’s riding a roller-coaster of emotion, and when the price was at its lowest, s/he was drained and ready to be done with it.  Then s/he calmed down and started thinking about the loss, self-justifying an increase.

Posted by mark on 12/26/07 at 08:32 AM

They’re called “freeways” around these parts.  You can here the hum of a freeway within a couple miles, but as long as you’re not too close, it just becomes background noise - this is a densly populated city, so you can’t expect quiet and the sound of crickets.

Posted by Alan on 12/26/07 at 08:36 AM

What down, the 10% or $86K is gone after commision, these sellers are trying to get out without taxable income on the debt forgiveness.

In my experience, these deals were done by a consortium of a several people, not just one, so one wonders how the investment was structured.

Posted by mark on 12/26/07 at 08:37 AM

ochomehunter!  You’re not supposed to use reason and logic in your comment - “I would not buy anything until the mortgage gets within 15% of what you would pay rental for the same property.” 

You’re supposed to share your feelings. e.g. This home FEELS too expensive;  I wouldn’t pay $200K for this home; For $600K it FEELS like I should get some land and maybe a pool; etc.

Posted by Smurf on 12/26/07 at 08:53 AM

In that case then:
I FEEL that with 0% down and big HELOC the owner would have FELT like moving to Puerto Vallarta instead of FEELIN’ extremely motivated to sell and if s/he/they sell it will be after a substantial haircut wink

Posted by buster on 12/26/07 at 08:55 AM

Are you kidding about paying $665,000 for this tract home?  I sure hope so.  The 2003 price factored in “expected” appreciation.  What’s the “expected” appreciation today?  Ummm…negative!  So instead of a premium over the fair rental (ie, living there) value for the expected appreciation, there should now be a discount for the virtually certain depreciation.  Any guess as to what that discount should be?

Posted by OptimusPrime on 12/26/07 at 08:57 AM

In all seriousness….$200k ???

Good luck..I’m sure you’ll see $200k if CA gets rocked by a 10.0 Earthquake that destabilizes the economy for the next decade.

There’s a difference between being rational and irrational…I find some Housing bears just as bad as Housing bulls.

Seriously if this home dipped to $500-600k neighborhood..I’d be a buyer!

Posted by Alan on 12/26/07 at 09:10 AM

I agree, my 2 cents is that the price will drop to $450K at the bottom.  It’s a tract home on a small lot near the freeway, competing with other tract homes on larger lots in neighboring cities.

Posted by Chuck Ponzi on 12/26/07 at 09:14 AM

Just as likely, the bank did not accept lower offer on short-sale and therefore they relist at lowest offer bank communicates they are interested in looking at.  I have seen that scenario several times in the past year.

Chuck Ponzi

Posted by Chuck Ponzi on 12/26/07 at 09:15 AM

Remember that in 2003, interest rates were 5.5% for jumbo.  Now they’re 6.25 to 7.85.

Posted by Chuck Ponzi on 12/26/07 at 09:17 AM

Agreed, but the noise is louder in winter for 2 reasons:

1.  Lower temps makes denser air transmit sound more
2.  Trees without leaves lose their buffering ability.

Generally, you want to be at least 2 miles away from a freeway to not hear it in the winter.  That’s my .02.

Posted by Chuck Ponzi on 12/26/07 at 09:18 AM

This definitely depends on whether the road is on an incline or decline.  there is no way to get rid of ambient noise completely, even with a sound wall.

Posted by bostonguy on 12/26/07 at 09:36 AM

I would definitely pay 650,000 for that home… 300 per sq ft in irvine is a good deal, and it won’t go much lower.  there is just too much demand for the irvine schools. 

I think the most interesting feature of this house is the fact that the bank is likely dictating the sales price based on its willingness to accept a loss on the short sale.  will they do better by eventually foreclosing?

Posted by American-Screamer on 12/26/07 at 09:47 AM

This is definitely a move up home so if you factor in a largish DP, perhaps 650K might work but that really depends on when you bought your first home and how much equity you carry over.  It seems that the further down the prices there is less money to carry into the next purchase making it more difficult to sustain these move-up home prices.

Posted by mark on 12/26/07 at 09:49 AM

The intended tone of my comment was sarcastic.  I was essentially thanking ochomehunter for providing a reasonable comment.

Posted by NanoWest on 12/26/07 at 09:57 AM

These homes will be in the $200 - $225 psf by 2011

Posted by anonymous on 12/26/07 at 10:14 AM

For those of us who just arrived at this fascinating blog, would you mind providing a quickie glossary for your acronyms?

GF?
DP?
HELOC?


IR = Irvine Renter, the author of the blog?

Thanks!
Former Irvine Resident, astounded by how much has changed

Posted by Law_Student on 12/26/07 at 10:16 AM

No way is that house worth $650,000.

Try $450,000.

Posted by Shark on 12/26/07 at 10:21 AM

Hey OptimusPrime - 600k?!  You kidding?  I will put money down that by summer 2010, prices for comparable homes in this area will top out at 550k.  And I mean the peak price.

Posted by 7 on 12/26/07 at 10:23 AM

HELOC is home equity line of credit.

As to the GF, I assme it mean girl friend, but it just does not make sense in this blog…

Posted by anonymous on 12/26/07 at 10:28 AM

Most places I’ve seen in Irvine have landscaping that doesn’t drop all of its leaves in the winter, but that might just be my preference for native and low water landscaping in me talking.

Posted by zovall on 12/26/07 at 10:29 AM

Welcome to IHB - Irvine Housing Blog wink

GF = Greater Fool
DP = Down Payment
HELOC = Home Equity Line of Credit

IR = Irvine Renter (the author of most of the blog’s content)

Posted by SacRenter on 12/26/07 at 10:29 AM

I had close friends whose backyard jutted up to a freeway.  They had a soundwall and they swore they couldn’t hear the noise from the cars.  The wall certainly muted the sound but the rest of us could still hear the noise.  I think they were just so used to it as background noise that they didn’t hear it anymore. 

Now when people tell me that the walls work I always take it with a grain of salt.  I think eventually we get used to noises and don’t notice it anymore.

Posted by mmg on 12/26/07 at 10:33 AM

450k is more like it.  :mrgreen:

Posted by mmg on 12/26/07 at 10:37 AM

hence most of the 450k predictions LOL
the problem is still to many koolaid drinkers (Irvine is different) :mrgreen:

Posted by mmg on 12/26/07 at 10:37 AM

“too many”

Posted by OptimusPrime on 12/26/07 at 10:43 AM

Shark, that’s the thing….asking for $979k now..if it does drop to $600k, you’re looking at close to a 40% discount.

If there are home buyers waiting in the wings for this….I seriously doubt another $50-100k discount would even matter.

Sure one could sit there and say, I will not budge, this is $225 per sq ft tops etc etc.

But it’s a market and if there’s a willing buyer, it will be bought.

Personally for me I would buy at $600k.  I am sure someone would buy in a heart beat at $700k.

It’s all up to you and your financial situation and what you’re ultimately willing to pay.

Posted by Mike on 12/26/07 at 10:46 AM

The house sold in 9/17/2003 for $665,000
If you put that total in an inflation calculator today that same money is:$741,167.98. The market went up from 03-05 then went down from 05-07. I think this house is worth a little more than 600k right now. If you wait it out and pick this house up for anything around 600k, your a hero.

Posted by Analytical Reader on 12/26/07 at 10:59 AM

I know the number of transactions in Woodbridge is down substantially from the prior year which makes analytical comparisons more difficult.  For the transactions which have occurred, what has been the going rate per square foot?  From the Zillow website, it appears that the detached housing in Woodbridge is going for $390 or so a square foot.  The number is headed south, but this appears to be the current rate that sellers are accepting.  Any thoughts?

Congratulations to IR for your efforts on your entertaining and informative blogsite.

Posted by Renting in Newport on 12/26/07 at 11:05 AM

GF = “Greater Fool”.

Posted by anonymous on 12/26/07 at 11:16 AM

All of you are referencing the original blog post (garage pictures? 2 posts?) which I can’t find, but I did find this interesting post about potential fraud:

http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2006/10/10/bad-investment-fraud-or-what/

I looked up the original property that started the thread:

http://www.zillow.com/Charts.htm?chartDuration=5years&testAds=false&zpid=61647235

It was resold at a $120k loss, about a year later.

I wonder if anyone knows how the whole thing worked out. Was it actually fraud? Was anyone prosecuted? Was it a case of identity theft and the perpetrators are gone?

Posted by anonymous on 12/26/07 at 11:20 AM

All of you are referencing the original blog post (garage pictures? 2 posts?) which I can’t find, but I did find this interesting post about potential fraud:

http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2006/10/10/bad-investment-fraud-or-what/

I looked up the original property that started the thread:

http://www.zillow.com/Charts.htm?chartDuration=5years&testAds=false&zpid=61647235

It was resold at a $120k loss, about a year later.

I wonder if anyone knows how the whole thing worked out. Was it actually fraud? Was anyone prosecuted? Was it a case of identity theft and the perpetrators are gone?
(having trouble posting
today

Posted by alan on 12/26/07 at 11:26 AM

“there is just too much demand”

That’s the problem, supply and demand.  For there to be too much demand buyers must outnumber sellers.  We have quite the opposite.  this is supposed to be the low season but inventory didn’t fall and it is at 16 months supply, instead of the normal 4-5 months.  My guess is that inventory will only increase as loans reset and the economy sours, placing more homes chasing fewer buyers, thus prices have to fall.

Posted by alan on 12/26/07 at 11:29 AM

shure, they may be 200 like you waiting to buy this home for 600K, but the problem is that there are 400 homes like this that need to sell.  You still underestimate the magnitude of the oversupply relative to the shortage of buyers.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 11:33 AM

Prices were way inflated by 2000…  I remember people moving to Lake Forest back in the late 90s because the rent in Irvine was getting too high.

I personally don’t see something like this ever being worth more than $200/sqft, especially considering that the lot is small enough to jump from your roof to your neighbor’s.

That being stated, someone will catch this knife in the upper $700k range and thing they are getting a steal.  What an ugly POS house.  In any other state it would currently sell for $220k max.  Once the dream is over things like this will sell for about double in the land of milk and rape that is Irvine.

Posted by Mr Vincent on 12/26/07 at 11:34 AM

“I would definitely pay 650,000 for that home”

IF
you have 20% down, and can easily afford & qualify for a 15 or 30 yr fixed rate loan, and you are ready to “set down your roots” & stay in this place for the next 15 to 20 yrs or so
THEN
go fo it @ 650k
ELSE
wait.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 11:41 AM

Sorry, but the fact that home prices tripled over the last 10 years is about as irrational as it gets.  Compared to the reality of that everyone in here is conservative.

Say that all credit went away and people were forced to pay cash.  How much do you think that house would be worth then?  How much would someone pay for it?

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 11:45 AM

You just broke my lollerskates.

“It won’t go much lower [than 300/sqft],” said the man from Boston.

Irvine schools are trash.

Posted by Mike on 12/26/07 at 11:49 AM

I get it…(5 minutes later)

Posted by Mike on 12/26/07 at 11:52 AM

Lets say it is worth $450K. I’ll pay $500k. So now what’s it worth?
I’ll bet someone will pay $550k. Maybe to you it’s worth $450K, but to the market? More.

Posted by Mike on 12/26/07 at 11:54 AM

15-20 years is a long time. Get a loan with no prepayment penalties and pay the house off in 10 years. Then look at buying a bigger home.

Posted by Mike on 12/26/07 at 12:08 PM

Irvine skools are da best in da nashon, I went dare.

Posted by lawyerliz on 12/26/07 at 12:09 PM

From no-so-sunny-today Space Coast Florida, I think this house and houses everywhere around the country will be selling for between 525 and $550,000 because. . .

If you take 20% of 525, you get 105,000 which gets you to a loan amount of $420,000.  I assume that most can scrounge up an additional $3,000 not including closing costs, and there you are.

My impression is banks everywhere are scared sh**less to loan money to anybody, no matter how impressive the credit scores and downpayment.  Hey lending maestro, are banks actually as opposed to theoretically giving out jumbos?

If I were moving to Irvine, which I am not, I’d not want to put more than 25% down, on the not-putting-all-eggs-in-one-basket paradyme.
(Paradine?  Paradime?  Paradygne?  Well, you know what I mean.)

Unless the houses are aimed at the really and truly rich of course.

Posted by lawyerliz on 12/26/07 at 12:11 PM

The original blog post is part of this post.  Look more carefully.

Posted by tregen on 12/26/07 at 01:17 PM

Everyone in Irvine is wealthy….. in their mind anyway.  Sure folks may good salaries here but I’d bet dollars to donuts that most people think they are a lot richer than they really (debt to assets ration) are and the free money is over.  Think banks are in a big hurry to give a jumbo, regardless of twenty percent down payment, on an asset that actual cannot realistically be evaluated in the current market? (see banks marking assets to market having to come up with billions and the markdown just keeps on going).

In addition, when this house actually hits the 600k mark do you honestly believe this is the best house you will find for this price?? Hell no, by that time 600k will get you a lot more house than this.  This on is definetly in the 450k-525k range at the bottom…. that is assuming the 2008 recession is a shallow one… anything deeper than a 3-4 month recession could drop the bottom price another 10/15 percent.  Just my BS .02.

Posted by tregen on 12/26/07 at 01:18 PM

may - make
ration = ration

Posted by tregen on 12/26/07 at 01:19 PM

still can’t spell ratio right.

Posted by Patricio on 12/26/07 at 02:52 PM

Who cares about the noise, the pollution will kill you way before the ears get damaged.

Posted by Shark on 12/26/07 at 03:09 PM

Optimus - Take Alan’s comment and add to it those qualifying to buy these houses are very low.  Who is in the market for this type of houses?  30+ professional couple with a couple of kids is what I’m thinking.  Even if both were making pretty good income, there wouldn’t be much left for savings and college fund and raising the kids.  Let’s say you would buy it.  Ok.  Would you buy it to flip it?  Would you buy it to live in it with your wife and 2 or 3 kids.  On this lot?  C’mon, not for that price.  It would never appreciate even after the kids grown up and move out.  No offense, but you sound like an agent trying to floor out the pricing possibilities on these flips.

Posted by ipoplaya on 12/26/07 at 04:33 PM

The place is worth $700-725K right now, i.e. if they priced it accordingly I think they would get a foolish buyer, and will likely drop to $525-575K by the time the real estate market stabilizes.

$450K is not going to happen on this property or others like it…  Inflation people, you have to consider years and years of inflation.  Even if in 2003 it was overvalued by 40%, that would still put it around $450K today considering inflation.

Posted by lendingmaestro on 12/26/07 at 05:52 PM

Jumbos are not bought buy the GSE’s, they are (were) bought by private investors.  These companies are not touching jumbo loans right now.  My bank has not sold a single solitary jumbo loan on the secondary market since AUGUST!!

Any jumbo loan currently originated is being retained on the banks balance sheet.  It is classified as “held-for-sale.”  Once the secondary market’s appetite returns (as if!) the banks will then start to unload them.

Posted by lendingmaestro on 12/26/07 at 05:55 PM

I was up in Monterey for Christmas and “foreclosures” were the talk of the town.  Everyone is thinking about it, whether they own a home or not.

Posted by former_irvine_resident on 12/26/07 at 06:34 PM

No worries tregen - I add that extra n at the end all the time and the spell checker doesn’t help me out either.

Posted by lawyerliz on 12/26/07 at 06:44 PM

Well, I closed by first regular loan since August last week.  Maybe your bank will sell one!

So they are making them and keeping them on the books.  No wonder the interest rate is so high.  How much equity, (if you can even figure that out) is your bank demanding percentage wise?

Won’t your bank run out of money to loan, since the mtg conveyor belt has gone away?

Will investors buy after a year or 2 of seasoning?  ‘Course that may only mean the equity has gone away in a year or 2.

Posted by tealeaf on 12/26/07 at 07:47 PM

There are cycles.  It could be that 10 years ago housing was oversold.  We know it was overbought in the past 5, why not oversold prior?  The issue is equilibrium in supply / demand.  Picking a bottom and comparing a peak is deceptive.  Look at the trend line and the fundamentals - cost to rent vs cost to finance/buy.

Say that all credit went away and people were forced to pay cash. How much do you think that house would be worth then? How much would someone pay for it?

Perhaps your Genius is beyond me, but this is potentially the most ridiculous comment I have ever read on any blog.  Say all movie theaters went away… would DVD rentals go up?  Say I had wheels… would I be a bicycle or a motorcycle?

Posted by Cal's Caddy on 12/26/07 at 08:20 PM

I thought Mark’s sarcastic remark was hilarious. Best of the day until tealeaf came in with, “Say I had wheels… would I be a bicycle or a motorcycle?” Classic.

Seriously, I truly wonder when I hear comments like, “I agree, my 2 cents is that the price will drop to $450K at the bottom.” or “I personally don’t see something like this ever being worth more than $200/sqft”. Do these people live in Irvine? Or even Orange County or SoCal? I live in Woodbridge and would buy this house at a below $700K price. Why? Because it is larger than my current home and I afford to buy it at that price and rent out my current home. Sure, it may go lower, but I’m not trying to time the market. If there is a property I’m willing to buy at a price I’m willing to pay, I’m in. I live here. I know what I can afford. I talk with friends, neighbors and acquaintances about what their plans are. There are just way too many people here with the means and desire to own property within these criteria.

Posted by patientrenter on 12/26/07 at 08:27 PM

lendingmaestro,

Ok, so banks are having to hold onto their jumbo loans, but they are still lending pretty darn freely.  Do I have that right?  And is that because (a) they are re-selling lots of loans to FHA, FNMA, etc, and (b) the FHLB is lending money very freely (in the amount of over half a trillion $ extra this year alone), even on loans that have downpayments of less than 20%.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 08:38 PM

You really couldn’t understand what I meant by that comment?  Here’s a hint: it was rhetorical.

If you had wheels you would still be slow.

Posted by alan on 12/26/07 at 08:43 PM

LA times front page today says to expect to pay $4/gallon for gas in 08.  That’s got to hurt the economy at some point.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 08:53 PM

If you admittedly don’t care about value, would you like to buy my old sofa for about $5k?  You can obviously afford it if you live in Irvine.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 08:59 PM

I wish there was a common metric which was independent of inflation.

Posted by tealeaf on 12/26/07 at 10:43 PM

I didn’t say it was not understood - I said it was ridiculous.  Mortgages may be in short supply, but they’re always going to be around.  To suggest that we should determine pricing based on a mythical assumption is, well, far below genius.

Posted by Genius on 12/26/07 at 11:38 PM

Way to put words in my mouth and miss my point entirely.

The boredom of being at the parents house in AZ must be killing me if I’m arguing over the interwebs.  Thank god I head back to socal tomorrow.

For all I care you can believe housing was oversold in 2002, crash my roflcopter, then go ahead and line up with the rest of the sheep to buy this pos tract home for $600k or whatever you can “afford.”

Posted by tealeaf on 12/27/07 at 07:01 AM

We were discussing 10 years ago - that would be 1997 - 1998, when I proposed housing was oversold… not 5 years ago—when I said housing was overbought.

You definitely need to get out of AZ, Genius.  Hope your time was well spent with parents, and safe travels coming back!

Posted by JimmyJohnson on 12/27/07 at 07:08 AM

ANYONE who pays more than $225k for this crap shack is BEYOND stupid. But then 95% of people living in Irvine are BEYONE stupid as well.

snicker.

Posted by doug r on 12/27/07 at 07:37 AM

Since my favorite motel chain is Motel 6, I am somewhat familiar with freeway noise. smile
The noise is worse at night-same reasons as winter-colder and I think other noises quiet down, so you notice it more. Also there is a LOT of long-haul truck traffic at night, if you’re near a hill or a high traffic entrance/exit with a lot of accelerating/deceleration (think JAKE breaks), then it can be really annoying.
I don’t know how much truck traffic the 405 gets, but I suspect a 10 lane freeway gets a fair bit…

Posted by doug r on 12/27/07 at 07:39 AM

Um, that’s brakes, not “breaks”. Firefox finds spelling, but not grammatical errors.

Posted by awgee on 12/27/07 at 08:21 AM

I am curious.  Those of you who write, “I would buy this property at a price of $600,000.” or something along that line, would you buy the property for whatever amount sounds reasonable if you thought the same property will be selling for 80% of that amount in two years?

Posted by ipoplaya on 12/27/07 at 08:45 AM

I would awgee.  I already own, so I don’t care about equity as loss as much as a renter…  Also, if I am buying for a 20-30 year hold as a primary residence, I don’t really much care about the value in 2 years.

Posted by Shark on 12/27/07 at 10:55 AM

Its not worth anywhere near 700k right now!  Mark this post and check back in 18 months.  525k top, 450k maybe.  I mean that’s a half million dollars for this.. c’mon.

Posted by Cal's Caddy on 12/27/07 at 10:58 AM

Everyone has different situations. My family is growing and we are tight in a 3br in Woodbridge. We would love to add a br or two. As current homeowners, our current mortgage is such that we could buy up and still hold on to the current home and rent it out.

Still, I would love to wait two years (or three) for prices to go lower. But if the right property comes along at the right price, I’m in. We have the 20% down, so it is just a matter of waiting. That being said, IMO, prices are above what we are willing to pay for the sq footage we are looking for. We will see what happens in 2008.

Posted by Shark on 12/27/07 at 11:05 AM

Ipop - what a comment..

Posted by ipoplaya on 12/27/07 at 11:19 AM

You don’t know what the hell you are talking about Shark.  14 Carnelian closed escrow on 10/10/07 for $975K.  It was 2500 sf.  That is $390 per sf and it’s around the friggin’ corner from this place.  You think prices have fallen 20% since September?!  Must be some good crack you are smokin’...

Hum, what else has closed in that neighborhood recently?  2 Briarglen, 10/15 close @ $699K for 1899sf.  18 Briarglen on 11/2 @ $650K for 1585sf…  Average per sf price in the $385 range on those.  This place is probably worth MORE than $ range I quoted - I was being conservative and hadn’t even looked at recent comps in that area.  They could move it for $750K right now if they wanted to.  Hell, they could probably move it for $800K right now.

Very recent comps, less some discounting for a falling market, indicate the current market value for a property.  YOU may not think it’s worth $700K for YOU, I might not think it’s worth $700K to ME, but those are personal opinions not indicators of market value.  Obviously people are buying houses in this area still and paying north of $350 per sf.  MLS doesn’t lie.

Posted by ipoplaya on 12/27/07 at 11:26 AM

I’m in the same situation Caddy.  Very tight in a 3/2 in West Irvine and want a 4th bedroom (at least), another shower, and hopefully a three-car garage for all the kid crap.

I don’t think we’ll hold our property as a rental though.  Why hold it as a rental if you could sell it now and buy it back later for maybe 20% less and turn it into a rental then?  Property tax base?

Posted by ipoplaya on 01/03/08 at 03:00 PM

So Shark, you still around? 

“Its not worth anywhere near 700k right now! Mark this post and check back in 18 months. 525k top, 450k maybe. I mean that’s a half million dollars for this.. c’mon.”

I marked your post.  Didn’t take 18 months to check back.  Just a week…  You still want to bet that this place isn’t worth over $700K as I suggested?  We’ll see once escrow closes but I have a feeling my figures were much closer than yours.

Your reply:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.