Replying to:

Posted by Nancy on 07/03/09 at 11:36 PM

Again, the above post wasn’t by me, but by a hacker. 

IrvineRenter - please consult your IT staff on safeguarding your blog from hackers.  A blog that allows hacking cannot function as an honest blog; it’s not worth participating.

Safeguarding the blog is not that hard, really, assuming you wish an “open” forum rather than a hacker’s forum.

Or is this IHB neutralizes opposition?

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 05:32 AM

The listing agent left out the best upgrade of all:

HeCouldDestroyUs.jpg

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 05:37 AM

A house just isn’t a house without your very own personal marble Star Wars kneeling pad and for those long talks with your master.

Posted by Mark on 07/03/09 at 05:41 AM

grin Turn about is fair play.

.....schadenfreude does coming.

I think he meant dose….

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 05:59 AM

Nothing but the best for these folks.  This house is only worthy of the most sophisticated among the living.

kfc_check.jpg

Posted by Illuminatus on 07/03/09 at 06:17 AM

Love the photoshop David!

Posted by Mikee on 07/03/09 at 06:21 AM

Sooo, did 14, 30, 28 Willow Grove sell? Foreclose?
What are the comps here?

I’m thinking since this guy bought the property in April for 742K, that is the best comp available, no?

Posted by MalibuRenter on 07/03/09 at 06:42 AM

The profit won’t be as large due to the $$$$$ spent on upgrades.  Maybe they will get someone paying enough to break even.  However, I see tons of forces lining up to make it more difficult.  Rising interest rates, rising unemployment, other bad economic news, etc.

Posted by winstongator on 07/03/09 at 06:52 AM

You can check them on redfin
-14 DW still on market @1.05M, 200k price reduction 225k below 06 sale
-30 DW sold for 860 6/09, almost 400k below 06 sale, but 10k above the price listed in IR’s post.
-28 DW sold 5/08 for 920, 330k below 06 sale, 70k above list from IR’s post

30 DW is probably the better comp, and the list price for this property will make 14 DW much less attractive as it’s a 4/3 with less sqft.  I’m sure that comparison would be in an agent’s sell.

One problem with the second sale of a home is that the second owner does not get to customize the way the original may have with the builder.  While you might love travertine floors, I might prefer wood, etc.  Original buyer pays full price, second buyer will pay less for those types of things.

It’s obvious because they were foreclosed, but buying a new, $1.35M home requires a large, stable income, or a huge real (not paper) net worth.  From what I’ve seen in FL builders sold a lot of $1M+ homes to people that shouldn’t have been buying them.

Posted by mav on 07/03/09 at 06:55 AM

The flipper bought it for $740K and that’s about what it will be selling for in 2015.  Now it’s time to find the sucker…. I’m willing to bet they do… one with a couple hondo grand in cash no less.

Posted by Dan in FL on 07/03/09 at 06:56 AM

I was wondering when the KFC bucket would return!

Posted by winstongator on 07/03/09 at 07:16 AM

What is IR really trying to do & say? The amount one pays for a home, and their ability to service the debt associated with the home are very, VERY important.  Warren Buffett is a buy and hold investor, but he would laugh at you if you said the price you buy an asset at isn’t important, and would laugh louder if you wanted to fund your purchase with debt you could not easily service.  What is a good investment at $50, is not as good an investment if it costs $100.  Buy that $100 asset with debt, and it can be doubly dangerous.

Some have the notion that you should not try to market time, and would probably use stock market timing as a counter-example.  The big difference between buying a home and investing in stocks is that with a home, you are committing to an asset price for 15 or 30 years, while long term stock investors are only committing 1/30th of their money each year. If one year is excessively bubbly, they only lose a fraction of 1/30th of their money.  While money you put in in 2007 has Dow-wise lost 40%, money you put in in 2003 is down 10%.

Nothing is ‘always’ a good investment or buying decision.  If something really was, someone else would come in and put money into it taking out the easy money.

Posted by Lee in Irvine on 07/03/09 at 07:31 AM

Even if this flipper does get $949,000 for this house, the damage to the neighborhood is significant.  This is a certified Comp Killer.

I don’t know why any investor would take a chance at something priced in this range.  There are better opportunities now outside of Orange County.

Posted by movingaround on 07/03/09 at 07:34 AM

Wow - best upgrade yet!

Posted by Lee in Irvine on 07/03/09 at 07:38 AM

It’s a race against the clock.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 07/03/09 at 07:44 AM

Oops! Spell checkers don’t catch mistakes like that one.

Posted by Nancy on 07/03/09 at 07:48 AM

If this house was in West L.A. the price would never have come down. There are 102 buyers for every house that is put on the market in West L.A.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 07/03/09 at 07:53 AM

Yes, it is different there because everyone wants to live there and they are running out of land. If you don’t buy now, you will be priced out forever.

Posted by Dan in FL on 07/03/09 at 07:56 AM

This sounds like the “hacked” Nancy again.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 07/03/09 at 07:57 AM

The people who claim you cannot time the market are generally those who need to make a living from market transactions. They need people to buy and sell even when it is not in their best interest to do so.

Market timing is very difficult for most people because it generally requires people to act opposite of what their emotions tell them (see Speculation or Investment?). Even the pros do not time the market perfectly, and many completely miss the turning points, but it certainly is possible to take advantage of market timing to improve on buy-and-hold investing.

Posted by Soylent Green Is People on 07/03/09 at 08:18 AM

Over $900k to live in a flight path. In how many years will this area begin to look like Inglewood? Yes, it’s a planned community. Yes still. It’s in a flight path! At least the beach areas bordering LAX have the beach to fall back on. What does this flatland have that other areas do not in this price range? I can think of a few… lower taxes, bigger lots, low or no HOA, peace and quiet…. What people pay today to live in OC is a mystery to me.

Posted by Gemina13 on 07/03/09 at 08:18 AM

So that’s why so many McMansions have those kind of floors.  Their owners belong to the Sith!

. . . or maybe they’re just geeks.

No, wait, they’d need brains to be geeks.  Definitely Sith.

Posted by thrifty on 07/03/09 at 08:39 AM

Nancy: you need to give us your zip code. There is money to be made there. I wouldn’t venture outside of it, however; there is a big recession surrounding you.

Posted by Nancy on 07/03/09 at 08:40 AM

To reverse the downturn in the housing market the government needs to replicate West L.A. If you took everything that is West L.A and placed it in Riverside, property values would surely follow. By everything I mean the great people, restaurants, and entertainment. If you transplanted a few longtime Santa Monica residents and put them on any block in any neighborhood in Riverside, the community would improve starting with the block in which the Santa Monica residents were first placed. It would look similar to an atom shockwave as it spreads out from the center, but in a positive way. I have written a letter to president Obama asking the he study my proposal.

Posted by mav on 07/03/09 at 08:47 AM

Market timing also requires some degree of wealth and/or a great degree of risk.  As the housing decline progresses doom and gloom will fill even the Nancy’s and Janet’s of the world.  The wealthy have a cushion to survive and prosper in the periods making bets when others can’t…. less wealthy investors need to be willing to take on the risk that things can get even worse and they can lose everything.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 08:52 AM

Thanks for the laugh, Kirk.

Posted by winstongator on 07/03/09 at 08:56 AM

As our family combined salary would now qualify us for this price home, we do not have nearly 190k saved for a DP.  I’m wondering how much as a % of cash savings or net worth people should or do put towards a DP.  If we did have a 200k emergency fund, I wouldn’t want to put it all into one basket.  I know in the bubble people just took the gain from one home and traded up, and others just used 100% financing.

One thing that is related to market timing is liquidity.  People were excessively long real estate and stocks in the bubble, and short liquid savings.  People neglected the rainy day fund to make the payments or play the market.  Things turn and you’re stuck.  It’s counterintuitive, but you should put more into your rainy day fund when it’s sunny, because you only draw it down when it rains!

You don’t need to time the market perfectly, but 20% YoY gains should raise eyebrows.

Posted by no_vaseline on 07/03/09 at 08:57 AM

IR is wrong.

This property is headed down the toilet because Columbus Grove is a shithole built on a superfund site.  Oh, and it’s under the flightpath for John Wayne.

(hat tip SG)

Q: What’s the difference between Columbus Grove and Inglewood?

A: Inglewood has a casino.

Posted by Surfing in Newport on 07/03/09 at 09:01 AM

I can’t remember who said it, I think it was one of my professors. Anyway, when you buy something on the open market you will pay $1 more than the next biggest fool. He was talking about business acquisitions, but the same goes for buying on the court house steps. If there isn’t something that is special just for you and nobody else, then chances are that the price is going to be bid up to where only a fool would buy it.

Don’t look to time a market…although it’s usually easy to spot if a market is rising or failing, it’s those damn peaks and troughs that are hard to spot. Look at the value of ownership vs. renting.

Posted by OC Progressive on 07/03/09 at 09:04 AM

The supply of people who can afford 3,000+ square foot homes for around a million is finite and shrinking, as a downward spiraling economy combines with tighter lending standards.

What we’ll continue to see is a buyer’s market, where the small number of people in this market have a very wide range of choices, and tremendous leverage. 

Who really needs a house this big?

Lots of folks have been concerned about sustainability, predicting Peak Oil, Peak Soil, and Peak Debt (which appears to have won the race).

Places like Columbus Grove may represent Peak House.

As people scale back to what’s affordable, and these 3000+ square foot houses on 5,000 foot lots will become the deadest section of the market, while buyers with money will focus on much smaller houses that are easier to maintain, clean, heat, and cool.

Posted by winstongator on 07/03/09 at 09:10 AM

The conventional RE wisdom seems to be trade-up-up-up, ignoring the idea that you don’t want to have your most expensive home when you’re retired.  Personally, we are waiting to ‘trade-up’, and I’m trying to figure out when someone in either trade-up/down would be best to wait in either rising or falling markets.  I figure if our home is $X and we are looking at 2-3X a 10% overall decline would be a net gain of .1-.2X.  I’m thinking wait to buy on the downturn, but sell quicker on the upturn.  That just works out to lean towards the less expensive home, and a roundabout way of realizing I’m cheap.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 09:22 AM

yeah.. David doesn’t realize that KFC don’t do it West of the Santa Ana Fwy (I5).

I think I better let him know that this Faux Chateaux is about a mile or so from Costo… so instead of KFC, that would be a take out Rotissery Chicken from Costco.  Or maybe a pizza… or maybe a polish dog… but KFC?  no way man….

Posted by mav on 07/03/09 at 09:23 AM

My philosophy is at least 1 years living expenses in cash, in addition to your long terms savings and 401K….. but you can adjust based on your risk tolerance.  At the end of the day it’s all about jobs and your particular job outlook if you are not independently wealthy.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 09:28 AM

Nancy might be right.

The traffic on LA’s West Side is gridlocked.  There really is no way to go file miles under an hour except during “drunk hour”.

So maybe the locals haven’t heard about market declines because they’re all stuck in their SUVs with the radio tuned to KFWB listening to Michael Jackson’s “news”.

To be serious, though, Nancy is full of it.  Just last week (two weeks?) ago the LA Times ran a column about the market on the West Side.  It’s hosed.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 09:33 AM

“Soylent Green… my kind of People”, Bender The Robot.

This house is not on the flight path to John Wayne.  The flight path is north, alongside the 55 and then crossing over the industrial park between the 55 and Red Hill.

In fact, the flight path to John Wayne is quite a bit north from ALL Irvine houses.  Santa Ana and Tustin are a different story.

The beach areas are LAX are nuts!  Smelly Gundo… yuck!

Posted by Walter on 07/03/09 at 09:34 AM

Your command of the force is strong, but the force of the market may be stronger.

Posted by Walter on 07/03/09 at 09:41 AM

But these other areas lack the glamor of flipping in Irvine.

I have been to see a handful of properties in beaten down areas. The average Irvine socialite would fear for their life in those areas.

Posted by Walter on 07/03/09 at 09:46 AM

I say both of you are right. Keep dumping superfund product on a declining market and you get CG.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 10:06 AM

Won’t work.

The resulting gridlock from Santa Monica Bay to Moreno Valley would prevent fresh sushi from reaching Riverside County.

With no organic, low fat, brown rice futomaki how would you feed those transplanted Santa Monica residents?  They’d be back on San Vicente Blvd within six months.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 10:10 AM

You’re wrong, IMHO.

A big home like this would be perfect to rent.  Can you imagine how many illegal aliens you could put in there?

The only problem is that you will need to figure out how to park ten clunkers.. I guess if you could make a drivethru you could pour concrete on the backyard and they could park and fix at least then trucketas back there.

Let me see… five familes, @ 800 bucks a month rent, that’s about 4000 per month.  You’ll need to add a fifth bathroom (one per family) and enclose the garage into additional bathrooms..

Do able. 

Columbus Grove… Irvine’s new working community.  Heck, they could take the bus to work on TR.

Posted by dafox on 07/03/09 at 10:13 AM

If there’s 102 buyers for every house in west LA, why is there no difference in the days on market between Irvine and West LA?

West LA days on market: 98
Irvine days on market: 99

As Piggington says: In God we trust. Everyone else bring data.

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 10:33 AM

I think you should write a haiku about it Solent.

Unless you are haiku-ed out?

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 10:35 AM

It’s a nice house, but not at that price.

Hey Californians, is there fear on the streets yet?

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 10:38 AM

Happy July 4th everybody.

Posted by newbie2008 on 07/03/09 at 11:11 AM

Almost all stock people say don’t try to time the market.  Almost all the stock people are market timers themselves.  Do you want to buy GE for $100 today?  I don’t think so.  GE at $100 is not a good time to buy.  The price does not support the earnings. Being a market timer doesn’t mean buying a the lowest point.  Just at a reasonable price and trying to avoid an almost certain loss.

How much was the outstanding loan on this house?  What was the discount on the house?

The house is nice looking.  The flipper might make a profit or not.  Auction buyers help clear up the FC/excess debt problem.  Cash and not another bad loan for the bank. Is the buyer a RE agent to lessen the selling cost?

Soylent Green Is People and NoVas… BTY: Inglewood was a up and coming place in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.  Lots of expensive stores and great jobs. Inglewood was special.

Posted by zubs on 07/03/09 at 11:26 AM

gay doods have double the male income, thus more money.

Posted by Dan in FL on 07/03/09 at 11:49 AM

Agreed on the market timing.  You DO want to time the market…you just don’t want to try to hit the EXACT top or the EXACT bottom.  5% variations are fine.  20-30% downside is not fine.

As for the flippers, I’ll disagree with the idea that they are clearing up the foreclosures.  This house is still on the market, isn’t it?  The only way to clear out inventory is to find long term owners.  These guys are just retailers.  Why buy from the retailer when you can buy from the wholesaler for cheap?

Posted by newbie2008 on 07/03/09 at 12:38 PM

Dan at least the flipper is removing it from the taxpayer paid bailout of the bank to an “investor” who will either make a profit or a loss.  Hope it not GS, etc., then the profit will be private and the loss socialized on the backs of the taxpayer.

some more green shoots:
http://www.rgemonitor.com/687/Real_Estate_and_Mortgage_Finance?cluster_id=12859

Not as bad as expected only 2.9% of prime loan are seriously delinquent.

NR: 40% with loans are underwater.

A TR FC was only ~9% underwater (looked like no DP purchase).  The bank people emptied the junk left over last week.  Family had an orderly move out the two weeks earlier.  No for sale sign yet.

http://www.financialtrustindex.org/images/Guiso_Sapienza_Zingales_StrategicDefault.pdf

Looks like the authors may be describing the start of similar situations in TR and Newport Beach. More on the negative price trigger instead of the percentage trigger.  The average American has moral and social constraints against strategic defaults that companies have been doing for the last decade.

Posted by CapitalismWorks on 07/03/09 at 01:58 PM

The is a KFC on PCH in CDM.

Posted by CapitalismWorks on 07/03/09 at 02:00 PM

This is troll.

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:10 PM

That’s a pretty good one Dave…where do you come up with these ideas?

Is it beer-thirty over there is AZ?

Have a good weekend!

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:12 PM

I toured these places when I lived across the street in Westpark and I think most of the upgrades were completed by the builder so this flipper probably hasn’t done squat to the place other than calling the maids to clean (if that!)

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:20 PM

Ha ha ha ha!

Maybe they’d airship if they wanted it bad enough?

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:23 PM

Depends where you’re at.  IE maybe.

Irvine not really…I just sold my condo for above asking in 2 days.

Thanks for checking in.

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:26 PM

You’re killin’ me today Tony!

LOL!

How’s it over there in TR?  Getting the nice ocean breeze like we are in NC?

Posted by ockurt on 07/03/09 at 02:36 PM

Actually, Inglehood has a lot more black people.

Call me ockirk today.

Posted by IrvineRenter on 07/03/09 at 03:16 PM

Hi Lawyerliz, it is good to see you again.

Posted by USCTrojanCPA on 07/03/09 at 05:48 PM

I’ll just wait a few years to buy a home half the size of this one for 1/3 of the price with double the lot size.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 06:16 PM

I have a strange imagination, I guess.

Posted by AZDavidPhx on 07/03/09 at 06:17 PM

beer-thirty, I like that. smile

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 07:21 PM

I have been sadly neglectful.  It all started when I forgot my password.

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 07:24 PM

Those constraints are gone, totally vanished in South Florida.  9% underwater?  A fleabite, a nothingburger, a bagatelle.  I’m regularly seeing
45-50% and more underwater. 

That 125% refi thing O is suggesting would do
nothing to help my clients.

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 07:26 PM

Thanks.  I really have to get the password thing straightened out to get on the forums again.

CaliboomsDay soon?

Posted by freedomCM on 07/03/09 at 07:54 PM

Don’t let it happen again!

It’s just wrong to only see your comments on CR, and not here.

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/03/09 at 08:07 PM

Above asking?  Wow.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 09:17 PM

Yeah, it’s been breeze but we also got the morning cloud cover.

Keeps the weather nice but wrecks the tomatoes.  Good for cucumbers and green peppers though.

Posted by tonye on 07/03/09 at 09:24 PM

Sorry, but I doubt their numbers.

In their intro the flippantly make the claim that as many as 50% of California homeowners have negative equity and they offer a link to zillow.

But that link does not support that claim.

A claim which I think it’s simply wildly untrue.

I was interested, but when I saw them make such fallacious claims I got turned off quickly.

Nice thesis, awful research.  Give them a D.

Posted by Laura Louzader on 07/03/09 at 09:36 PM

Glad to see you back, Liz. How is Miami these days? I miss the place.

However bad it is, it couldn’t be worse than the South Loop of Chicago. Or my nabe on the north side, which is Foreclosure Central of the northland.

And bad is maybe good here. Prices on some properties are approaching rent parity.

Posted by Nancy on 07/03/09 at 11:59 PM

We call them Fundamentalists (price/income ratio subscribers), and Market Timers, those waiting to hear the Great IR tell his loyal subjects to BUY!. 

Remember, *Prime* is defined by what is in Demand, and what is *Prime* will NEVER be at Fundamental value, no matter how much we wish it or attack it by showing losers herein this blog.  Prime may depreciate from peak, but *relatively* less than other areas.  In areas where people sell once every 30 years, “peak” is meaningless to homeowners;  noone loses sleep over losing $100K from peak, since they don’t HELOC or need that money. Prime will NEVER be at *absolute* Fundamentals, so using this approach for market-timing buying may get you fast into Compton ganghouse before it sinks below fundamentals. 

Let’s keep waiting for our European Vacation at $1.1 USD/Euro.

BTW, I wonder if IR’d profile the *Prime* home he’d be living in long after his BUY call, for the benefit of your schaedenfreude?

Posted by winstongator on 07/04/09 at 06:07 AM

Broward county, where I’m from, has some condo/townhouses selling REO for 75-80% off peak, and new 06/07 construction selling 50% off peak, and 02/03 selling below their new prices.  I know of at least 2 sellers that sold at 45% lower than their purchase price but ate the loss AFAIK.  Broward-Dade-Palm Beach is about as bad as it gets.

What initially clued me in to the bubble was the lack of enough high paying jobs in that area to justify the housing prices.  I knew what people did for a living and couldn’t figure out how or why they could afford homes at those prices.  Obviously many couldn’t, and with an area so dependent job-wise on real-estate it’s been hit doubly hard.

Posted by lawyerliz on 07/04/09 at 06:18 AM

Gosh, I thought you all would be mad at me.

Posted by LC on 07/04/09 at 09:21 AM

A “greenbelt view” could mean that most of your windows look into the back of a hillside about 30 feet away, and there are more levels of houses above you.

Posted by tlc8386 on 07/04/09 at 09:24 AM

I am also from this area and you are right the high quality jobs left South Fla. a long time ago. And it just as could happen here in Irvine as well. It did back 1989 when Aerospace left The OC.
Irvine had a very large finance industry here as well and many places have closed down. Some are still alive and well as long as we have low mortgage rates. When those eventually go back up you will see more job losses because of less flipping, refinancing, buying of homes.

http://economy.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/30/oc-ranks-5th-in-us-for-job-losses/

Until we turn around the job losses this market will continue to go down.

Posted by newbie2008 on 07/04/09 at 08:30 PM

Nancy,
Maybe you have the ability to lose $100,000 from a peak purchase price, but the TR condo was FC on only 9% underwater (~$80,000).  You can tell the FCed TR family or to other families underwater by 50% what you wrote. Layerliz and winstongator can cite example, but I sure you can log on to the MLS and look into property underwater.

True premium areas are more resistant to downturns than subprime areas, but they are not immune.  Recovering from buying at the peak is hard and may take a life time.  Inglewood (city) and Adam St om L.A. were once prime areas. Poor person that purchased at the peak and sold 30 to 40 years later. 

Even without a working crystal ball, I can say that playing Russian Roulette is a bad idea.  Buy at unsustainable prices are unwise in the long run.  Unsustainable prices benefit those that obtain a percentage of the sales price no matter what happens to the buyer.  RE agents and HM brokers left the buyers and taxpayers holding the bag.

A better payment model for the RE agents and HM broker would be partial payments until completion of the loan.  Dramatically reduced commissions for FC’s.

As for bailout and losing seasoned financial employee, one example that I know of is a NorCal bank employee in the stock/mutual fund sales side, retention bonus of million for a 6 year more years.  He passed on it (hoping for a better offer), but now the new offer is $60,000 which he took.  He has a BA degree, but it’s all BS.  Buy before it goes up.

Posted by newbie2008 on 07/04/09 at 08:45 PM

Lawyerliz wrote:
“Gosh, I thought you all would be mad at me. “

For what?

Unemployment numbers are not that meaningful unless your one of those numbers.
Comparisons of unemployment rate and “non-seeking/discouraged” rate would be more meaningful to compare countries.

Your reply:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.